Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce Danckwerts's avatar

I have not read the entire article, but it has struck me that Homo stupidiens is doing it again! We are paying people in the Northern Hemisphere to rewild their farms, while allowing farmers in Brazil, Congo and Indonesia to cut down forest, so that they can grow soy or palm oil or other crops to export to the Northern Hemisphere. Time for a global ban on the cutting of any indigenous woodland/forest. We could use an army of citizen scientists to monitor it on Google Earth (or the more frequently updated options like EOS). Instead of rewilding a farm in Europe they could grow a soy substitute so that Brazil does not have to grow it for them.

Deanna Pumplin's avatar

Meanwhile city, county, state and federal policy makers and implementers have us trapped in old paradigms that encourage road building, logging old growth, "legacy", and diverse species forests, and thinning, inappropriate controlled burns, and other activities that can make fires worse. How can we get this information about the role of forests, water and climate regulation to more journalists, more people, to governmental decision makers? It's also a problem of channeling the need for jobs for workers away from environmentally degrading work to work that supports earth's living systems and work that is in alignment with the limitations of earth's ecosystems. Thanks so much, Rob, for continuing to post such readable and important information.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?